Friday 31 January 2014


Causeway U3A Current Affairs topics – 23Jan14

Another year, another Causeway U3A Current Affairs Group Meeting. We’ve put the indulgences of Christmas and the New Year behind us and with renewed resolution it’s back to business. There’s a world out there that needs to be saved after all, isn’t there? And it’s all down to us. We may seem an unlikely lot. Some might imagine we are a motley crew of free bus passers but we know that this room is Thursday afternoon home to a wealth of experience, knowledge, wisdom and maturity. And while we sit there in our comfy chairs, dunking our ginger nuts in our piping hot tea, with the rain belting it down on the large bay window of the Cromore Halt, we are well aware of our mission.  The government hasn’t done it. The politicians and the councillors can’t do it. It’s up to us now. And so we gather: former academics, businessmen and women, teachers, medics, bankers, philosophers, farmers alike. To a man (and woman of course), we are ready for the task ahead.

So what has our Jerry got in store for us this month?




Ian PaisleyThe Paisley Affair

Well Paisley’s the name of the game this week isn’t he? All these years later and he’s still making headlines. But as Jerry suggests are all prominent men and empires in reality impermanent and are their legacies fated to decay? Looks like it, doesn’t it? So much the better! And what did the Big Man himself ever do for us? And who on earth thought it was a good idea to make him a Lord?

The question: Paisley - another Ozymandias? Following the last two weeks television programmes, we have been presented with a man who bitterly seems to believe he has been rejected by the church and the political party he founded. What is Paisley’s actual contribution to Northern Ireland?

 

 

 

 

Whatyamacallhim Hass

Anyone remember Hass? And his side mate Megan whatsit? He came, he saw ………….. and then he scurried off home again. Bit of a flurry. We all got a tad overexcited. A lot of toing and froing on the Hill. Our Naomi and all her positivism, God love her. Even Martin being a wee bit optimistic. But Mike and his mates wouldn’t play the game. And then it was over. Same old, same old. But who would blame Hass? Poor sod. He never had a chance, did he? We had a fleeting chance to put things right. We could have. We should have. But hey, as they sort of say, ‘We’re not USA. We’re Norn Ireland’.

The question: Hass talks what do we think? On the three talk subject areas of; ‘the past’, ‘flags’ and ‘parades’. What is your suggestion on? The Past: should terrorists/the states forces be given immunity if they provide information about victim’s loved ones death? Flags: assuming this is driven largely by identity, how do you view your identity? Parades: Would you propose reducing these in number and if how would you distribute them?

 

 

Unemployed youth

And then there’s the million dollar question of the unemployed youth. How do we pick ourselves out of this big hole we have all fallen into? Does anybody care about this forgotten generation? Is it our education system? Is it our employers? Is it young people themselves? Easy to make them the scapegoats, isn’t it? ‘Pack of wasters……They should just get out there, get on their bikes……All they do is lie around all day, in their rooms……… listening to the rain ………………. dunking ginger nuts in their tea ……………….’ Umm …….

The question: Young unemployed, across Europe almost a quarter of young people were jobless in 2013. However only 40% of employers in Europe are confident of being able to recruit enough graduates for the year. Is our education policy correct? Should we always educate first and then get a job? Should employers take on more education and training to meet their requirement?
 

Oh là là! Hollande!

And then there’s the little question of Hollande and his multiple First Ladies. ‘Bof! Pas de problème’ as far as the French are concerned. It seems Paul Whiteman and the Palais Royale Orchestra were right ….. ‘Everybody’s doing it, doing it, doing it……..’ Where’s the outrage? Or is that something which is solely confined to us more puritanical, more Northern Europeans? Bring on the free Presbyterians! ………Or perhaps we too should just be ‘appy to see our leaders ‘ave a leetle fun on ze side’?

The question: President Hollande managed to brushed off questions about his third publically known girlfriend, it was ‘a private matter’ he stated. How can French politicians get away with such liaisons whilst such relationships brought down politicians in Britain and even Mrs Robinson here? Are the French press and people too deferential to politicians? Is their attitude to ‘I’amour’ as an important part of French culture and history valid in today’s world? Or perhaps  we in these islands are too puritanical?

 

The Rosetta spacecraft

Rosetta! Rosetta! Wakey! Wakey! Time to get busy! The world is awaiting all your discoveries. Religion is so last decade. Science is the new way forward. Time to get to work! Tell us all you know. Where do we come from? What is our destiny? Will we always live here? Not to hurry you but some people here are getting a wee bit impatient, you know!

The question: Rosetta, the European spacecraft, launched 10 years ago and put ‘too sleep’ for the last period of its journey, has successfully been ‘woken up’ as it approaches its target, an asteroid. There it will attempt to land an instrument to take a rock sample and analyse it. What, if any, is the value of this experiment to society?

 

 

The Educational panel

Come back educational panel! Give us another go at you! Darn it!

The question: Did we let our educational panel off too lightly?   Mervyn’s ‘it is very complicated but we all say similar words’, a politician’s excuse. Helen’s this is what I want for my child is nice but how many types of education can we afford? PJ’s implication that teacher’s values and passion is only available in faith based schools? Prof Smith’s you cannot afford all of this was ignored.

6 comments:

  1. The Paisley Affair
    Good timing mate! Could be one of the best things youv’e done in your ‘oh so illustrious’ career! Spot on! Peter lying low (in a manner of speaking) up there on the Hill, all cozied up with his BMF Nigel, hoping everybody had finally forgotten the whole Iris’s toy boy episode. (As if!) The devious duo had even managed to turn the tide on our wee Naomi with the whole flegs thing. God love her. But same girl is well able for them at the end of the day and she’ll muster up support again with all her no nonsense democracy talk. You’ve got to love her. Mike and his mates are looking, well, just ridiculous, frankly. UKIP Norn’ Ireland style. No threat there to Pete’s kingdom. So Elections looming, everything was looking rosy for Mr. Devious himself and his faithful Tonto. Then out of the ashes, fresh from his hospital bed, in a final flurry of revenge, rises the King of Ulster himself, accompanied as has always been and will always be, by the Evil Eileen. Poor old blue eyed Peter still doesn’t know what hit him. All that time he thought he’d put that particular demonic duo to bed. But once again the Paisley Dynasty rose up against their archenemy and this time, after all those years, they well and truly laid waste the Robinsons. It’s Dallas all over again! Bring it on JR! Sorry. I mean Big Ian! You’re the man! Go knock Mr Devious and his side kick Mr Invisible into touch and then your wee Ian Junior can have the big seat …………………….. As long as everyone’s forgotten the Sweeney sleaze episode, that is.

    But as for your legacy? Maybe your maker can have a word with you about all of that! I suspect you overstepped the mark a tad with your Anti-Catholicism diatribes. I’m pretty sure he didn’t mean you to go out there rabble rousing. And then there was the whole red beret thing. Not sure he'd like that really. And he might have preferred you to have led the people to agreement a whole load of years earlier. All that tragedy while you went on your whole 'Ulster says no!' jaunt. Ummmm! .............. Not the best policy methinks. The whole church thing, well, to my mind he might just deem that a little too self-promotional for his liking. And I don’t think he’s too keen on self-delusion and well, judging by his son, I imagine he's a whole load keener on humility than egocentrism. All in all it’s not looking so good for you Ian, old boy. But then he's maybe not so keen on sleaze ball Robinson either so there's a fair chance he may well look with favour on your parting shot. Good luck to you, mate!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Whatyamacallhim Hass
    Poor sod! Did nobody warn him? Had he not read the papers? What was he thinking? A couple of months and he and the lovely Meghan would have it all sorted. Flegs……… parades………… history: he was going to help us solve all the biggies. As if that was ever going to happen! Whatever would we do then? We'd have nothing to fight about! The 'us or them' politicians would all be out of work! Big Mike would be on the dole! Peter, Martin and all the lads would have to hand the reins over to reasonable people and where would we find any? We'd have to ask Anna Lo if she had any friends looking for a job.
    Ok. Our Naomi tried her very best and well Martin has plenty of experience in working the International brigade. A few insignificant others probably also tried to take it all seriously. But then big Mike drags in the full force of the Orange Order and all was lost. Again! Inevitable really. You'd nearly think we don't want to solve our problems.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Unemployed youth
    There they go again. On and on about it. At the gym. In the butchers. Outside the hairdressers. Everywhere you go! It’s all you hear these days. One endless Romper Room magic mirror list of young jobseekers, aimlessly waiting for that letter to come through the door, inviting them to interview. ‘I can see Anthony, Freya, Patrick, Anna …………..’ A whole generation back from uni. Living at home. Eating our food. Using our electricity. Loads of qualifications. No jobs. Have we just brought up a generation of lazy young people? Don’t they want to work? ……………. Or maybe it’s something we’ve done?
    No such problem in Germany! With only 7% of young people unemployed as against 25% in the rest of Europe you’ve got to ask the question, haven’t you? What is the government there doing that we aren’t? Well the answer’s simple. Nothing! The German government isn’t pouring millions into new initiatives at all. It isn’t attacking the Education system. It isn’t blaming teachers, parents, whoever else they can think of.
    What is different about Germany though is that industry has been encouraged to have a major input in the education of young people. German industries fund work placements, training and apprenticeships on a systematic basis. The government has for a long time worked with industries, allowing them to withdraw suitable candidates for a few days a week from an early age and train them up within their industry. Students gain industry specific vocational qualifications and are then able to walk into appropriate positions when they finish their education. Difficult if industries then collapse. But I would hazard a guess that the qualifications the young people receive are much more transferable than our home grown Michael Gove’s ‘Bring back the Classics!’ policies might allow.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh là là Hollande!
    Come on François. You can’t have you gâteau and eat it, you know. It’s just not boules. And surely Valérie’s hard ‘un oeuf’ to ‘andle without ordering up a Julie on the side? So next time you feel like tenderizing your meat or buttering your muffin, try a little less of the double dipping and no more eating out. Time to discard your leftover Valérie and order out for a while. Julie may well end up your ‘plat du jour’ but you may be better off in the long run cutting back on your overindulgences …………….. although Berlusconi did quite well on it, didn’t he?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Rosetta Spacecraft
    Ok so in reality I’m not sure I know what a comet is. It’s a bit like an asteroid apparently but unfortunately I don’t know what that is either. I do have a very serious lack of knowledge in anything ‘out there’ really. But what I do have and it’s something I dearly cherish, is a very clear memory of sitting in front of an outdoor TV screen in an obscure campsite in the South of France when Neil Armstrong took his first steps onto the surface of the moon. I can hear him now: ‘one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.’ There he was, stepping backwards out of the Lunar Module onto the unknown: the uninviting rocky surface of the moon with Buzz Aldrin not far behind him, drinking in the ‘magnificent desolation’. And there we all were, sitting on our camp stools, French, Dutch, German, Spanish whatever……………. every one of us fascinated, enthralled, captivated, in awe of it all. So what if all we got out of it was non-stick frying pans and upside down pens. You can never take away that extreme global pride we all experienced in human achievement. July 1969 saw a world united in wonder. In wonder at the elements, yes. But the landing on the moon for most of us was also the first time we had ever heard the word ‘endeavour’. Apollo 11 demonstrated to us our capacity as human beings. And perhaps for some of us it also brought home our responsibility to endeavour to achieve to the best of our abilities. If Rosetta was to deliver even a little taster of that desire to explore our full potential then we must all look forward to reaping the rewards of this latest adventure in space.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Education Panel
    I suppose we were all a little taken aback by Mervyn’s user friendly approach. The DUP have clearly been PRd into the 21st century after all. And in a way it was an easy topic for him. He can obviously claim to be very much for Integrated education because he knows that other parties will make counter demands and so the Dup’s stance will never really be tested. So maybe we were not to blame for being too soft on him. We did make it clear that we would not be happy with the suggested compromise scheme and that we were aware that there had been no big investment in Integrated Education as there has been in Shared education. Perhaps that was as much as we could achieve at this stage.
    Helen’s stance just makes sense. How could anyone deny the benefits of teaching children together? Helen also recognises that Integrated Education was never meant to be another sector. It always aimed to be main stream. But that would entail change from within the traditional schools and that does not come easily. Don’t blame Helen! Blame the intransigence of the existing schools that, in their fear of change, hold fast to an outdated, inappropriate, ultimately damaging, segregated system which does nothing to diminish our self-made barriers.
    The problem with PJ is that he is so affable. Misguided but affable. His passion is clear, his values dear to him. How can we argue with a man who has given his all for his boys? He just doesn’t see that the system within which he was teaching has failed us all. If the fundamental message you are giving your students is one of segregation both by gender and by religion, then it will never again matter how many friendly matches you may conjure up. Your students have learned the concept of difference. In today’s world we would never educate black children separately from white children. We know that is wrong. Isn’t it time we learned that it is also wrong to separate children of differing religions and gender? We were a bit kind to PJ. But he probably knows why.
    I’m not so sure the Prof was ignored after all. We may not remember the figures but I’m pretty sure we all went away with a clearer picture of just how much politicians in this land are prepared to spend to maintain the status quo. Imagine where we might get to if they all decided to back the right horse for once!

    ReplyDelete